<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking the Sign-in or Create Account Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sephskerritt.com/2010/02/16/rethinking-the-sign-in-or-create-account-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sephskerritt.com/2010/02/16/rethinking-the-sign-in-or-create-account-interface/</link>
	<description>Startups, Design, Marketing, User Experience, New York, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:33:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seph250</title>
		<link>http://sephskerritt.com/2010/02/16/rethinking-the-sign-in-or-create-account-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>seph250</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sephskerritt.com/?p=176#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Exactly. If a visitor is new to a website, they&#039;re going to be hesitant to give over a lot of personal information right away, so there are advantages to taking this information in stages.  It&#039;s partly about the time spent, but it&#039;s also about establishing trust over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. If a visitor is new to a website, they&#8217;re going to be hesitant to give over a lot of personal information right away, so there are advantages to taking this information in stages.  It&#8217;s partly about the time spent, but it&#8217;s also about establishing trust over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Miller</title>
		<link>http://sephskerritt.com/2010/02/16/rethinking-the-sign-in-or-create-account-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sephskerritt.com/?p=176#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Good stuff, less is truly more. I&#039;ve been working a lot on my company&#039;s website to reduce the amount of required fields on forms for our landing pages, and totally removing optional fields. It&#039;s surprising how much more willing visitors are to sign up when they have less to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff, less is truly more. I&#8217;ve been working a lot on my company&#8217;s website to reduce the amount of required fields on forms for our landing pages, and totally removing optional fields. It&#8217;s surprising how much more willing visitors are to sign up when they have less to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://sephskerritt.com/2010/02/16/rethinking-the-sign-in-or-create-account-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sephskerritt.com/?p=176#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Really clever, Seph -- I like this new design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really clever, Seph &#8212; I like this new design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seph250</title>
		<link>http://sephskerritt.com/2010/02/16/rethinking-the-sign-in-or-create-account-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>seph250</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sephskerritt.com/?p=176#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Thanks doug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks doug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Bright</title>
		<link>http://sephskerritt.com/2010/02/16/rethinking-the-sign-in-or-create-account-interface/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sephskerritt.com/?p=176#comment-121</guid>
		<description>I dig this quite a bit. Have you found anyone else using a similar construct or is this twist all yours?

Looking at this makes me ask a couple of questions off the top of my head.

1) In this age of &quot;Forgot my Password&quot; functionality where a password reset is only a click away, do we really need a verify password box anymore? If a reset password is going to show up by email it seems like we should have a verify email box, if anything. I think you&#039;re doing the right thing by leaving it out.

2) Does this raise any security concerns? For example, when I type s*e*p*h@propercloth.com (edited) into the email field I get a big green ding ding ding telling me that there&#039;s an account by that name. Granted, that one is pretty obvious. But then I try messing around a bit more and I can see that Ajay has an account, but it&#039;s his GMail account, not his school one. That being said, maybe it&#039;s not actually an issue since it&#039;s not really any different than the &quot;that username is already taken&quot; message that appears on loads of other sites. I&#039;d be interested to see what others think about it.

Anyhow I&#039;m looking forward to seeing how this works out. I can definitely see implementing something like it with Istobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dig this quite a bit. Have you found anyone else using a similar construct or is this twist all yours?</p>
<p>Looking at this makes me ask a couple of questions off the top of my head.</p>
<p>1) In this age of &#8220;Forgot my Password&#8221; functionality where a password reset is only a click away, do we really need a verify password box anymore? If a reset password is going to show up by email it seems like we should have a verify email box, if anything. I think you&#8217;re doing the right thing by leaving it out.</p>
<p>2) Does this raise any security concerns? For example, when I type s*e*p*h@propercloth.com (edited) into the email field I get a big green ding ding ding telling me that there&#8217;s an account by that name. Granted, that one is pretty obvious. But then I try messing around a bit more and I can see that Ajay has an account, but it&#8217;s his GMail account, not his school one. That being said, maybe it&#8217;s not actually an issue since it&#8217;s not really any different than the &#8220;that username is already taken&#8221; message that appears on loads of other sites. I&#8217;d be interested to see what others think about it.</p>
<p>Anyhow I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how this works out. I can definitely see implementing something like it with Istobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
